Is There an Economic Case for Training Intervention in the Manual Material Handling Sector of Developing Countries?

Autor: Lahiri S; Department of Economics (Dr Lahiri, Dr Tempesti), University of Massachusetts Lowell; Occupational Ergonomics Laboratory (Dr Gangopadhyay), Department of Physiology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India., Tempesti T, Gangopadhyay S
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine [J Occup Environ Med] 2016 Feb; Vol. 58 (2), pp. 207-14.
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000603
Abstrakt: Objective: To estimate cost-effectiveness ratios and net costs of a training intervention to reduce morbidity among porters who carry loads without mechanical assistance in a developing country informal sector setting.
Methods: Pre- and post-intervention survey data (n = 100) were collected in a prospective study: differences in physical/mental composite scores and pain scale scores were computed. Costs and economic benefits of the intervention were monetized with a net-cost model.
Results: Significant changes in physical composite scores (2.5), mental composite scores (3.2), and pain scale scores (-1.0) led to cost-effectiveness ratios of $6.97, $5.41, and $17.91, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that program adherence enhanced effectiveness. The net cost of the intervention was -$5979.00 due to a reduction in absenteeism.
Conclusions: Workplace ergonomic training is cost-effective and should be implemented wherein other engineering-control interventions are precluded due to infrastructural constraints.
Databáze: MEDLINE