Improving the analysis of routine outcome measurement data: what a Bayesian approach can do for you.

Autor: de Vries RM; University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, the Netherlands., Meijer RR; University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, the Netherlands. r.r.meijer@rug.nl., van Bruggen V; Dimence, Almelo, The Netherlands., Morey RD; Cardiff, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: International journal of methods in psychiatric research [Int J Methods Psychiatr Res] 2016 Sep; Vol. 25 (3), pp. 155-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Oct 08.
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1496
Abstrakt: Since recent decades, clinicians offering interventions against mental problems must systematically collect data on how clients change over time. Since these data typically contain measurement error, statistical tests have been developed which should disentangle true changes from random error. These statistical tests can be subdivided into two types: classical tests and Bayesian tests. Over the past, there has been much confusion among analysts regarding the questions that are answered by each of these tests. In this paper we discuss each type of test in detail and explain which questions are, and which are not, answered by each of the types of tests. We then apply a test of each type on an empirical data set and compare the results. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
(Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje