Key Findings from Preclinical and Clinical Drug Interaction Studies Presented in New Drug and Biological License Applications Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2014.

Autor:	Yu J; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington., Ritchie TK; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington., Zhou Z; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington., Ragueneau-Majlessi I; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington imaj@uw.edu.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals [Drug Metab Dispos] 2016 Jan; Vol. 44 (1), pp. 83-101. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Sep 30.
DOI:	10.1124/dmd.115.066720
Abstrakt:	Regulatory approval documents contain valuable information, often not published, to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) profile of newly marketed drugs. This analysis aimed to systematically review all drug metabolism, transport, pharmacokinetics, and DDI data available in the new drug applications and biologic license applications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014, using the University of Washington Drug Interaction Database, and to highlight the significant findings. Among the 30 new drug applications and 11 biologic license applications reviewed, 35 new molecular entities (NMEs) were well characterized with regard to drug metabolism, transport, and/or organ impairment and were fully analyzed in this review. In vitro, a majority of the NMEs were found to be substrates or inhibitors/inducers of at least one drug metabolizing enzyme or transporter. In vivo, when NMEs were considered as victim drugs, 16 NMEs had at least one in vivo DDI study with a clinically significant change in exposure (area under the time-plasma concentration curve or Cmax ratio ≥2 or ≤0.5), with 6 NMEs shown to be sensitive substrates of cytochrome P450 enzymes (area under the time-plasma concentration curve ratio ≥5 when coadministered with potent inhibitors): paritaprevir and naloxegol (CYP3A), eliglustat (CYP2D6), dasabuvir (CYP2C8), and tasimelteon and pirfenidone (CYP1A2). As perpetrators, seven NMEs showed clinically significant inhibition involving both enzymes and transporters, although no clinically significant induction was observed. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and pharmacogenetics studies were used for six and four NMEs, respectively, to optimize dosing recommendations in special populations and/or multiple impairment situations. In addition, the pharmacokinetic evaluations in patients with hepatic or renal impairment provided useful quantitative information to support drug administration in these fragile populations. (Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu