Helmets for Kids: evaluation of a school-based helmet intervention in Cambodia.

Autor:	Ederer DJ; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA McNeal Professional Services, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA., Bui TV; Asia Injury Prevention Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia., Parker EM; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA., Roehler DR; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA McNeal Professional Services, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA., Sidik M; Asia Injury Prevention Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia., Florian MJ; Asia Injury Prevention Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia., Kim P; Asia Injury Prevention Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia., Sim S; Asia Injury Prevention Foundation, Phnom Penh, Cambodia., Ballesteros MF; Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention [Inj Prev] 2016 Feb; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 52-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 25.
DOI:	10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041434
Abstrakt:	Objective: This paper analyses helmet use before and after implementing Helmets for Kids, a school-based helmet distribution and road safety programme in Cambodia. Methods: Nine intervention schools (with a total of 6721 students) and four control schools (with a total of 3031 students) were selected using purposive sampling to target schools where students were at high risk of road traffic injury. Eligible schools included those where at least 50% of students commute to school on bicycles or motorcycles, were located on a national road (high traffic density), had few or no street signs nearby, were located in an area with a history of crash injuries and were in a province where other Cambodia Helmet Vaccine Initiative activities occur. Programme's effectiveness at each school was measured through preintervention and postintervention roadside helmet observations of students as they arrived or left school. Research assistants conducted observations 1-2 weeks preintervention, 1-2 weeks postintervention, 10-12 weeks postintervention and at the end of the school year (3-4 months postintervention). Results: In intervention schools, observed student helmet use increased from an average of 0.46% at 1-2 weeks preintervention to an average of 87.9% at 1-2 weeks postintervention, 83.5% at 10-12 weeks postintervention and 86.5% at 3-4 months postintervention, coinciding with the end of the school year. Increased helmet use was observed in children commuting on bicycle or motorcycle, which showed similar patterns of helmet use. Helmet use remained between 0.35% and 0.70% in control schools throughout the study period. Conclusions: School-based helmet use programmes that combine helmet provision and road safety education might increase helmet use among children. (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu