Phenotypic responses to social defeat are associated with differences in cued and contextual fear discrimination.

Autor: Dulka BN; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States., Lynch JF 3rd; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States., Latsko MS; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States., Mulvany JL; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States., Jasnow AM; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, United States. Electronic address: ajasnow@kent.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Behavioural processes [Behav Processes] 2015 Sep; Vol. 118, pp. 115-22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.06.009
Abstrakt: Conflict among individuals is one of the most common forms of stressors experienced across a variety of species, including humans. Social defeat models in mice produce two phenotypic behavioral responses characterized by prolonged social avoidance (susceptibility) or continued social interaction (resistance). The resistant phenotype has been proposed as a model of resilience to chronic stress-induced depression in humans. Previously, we have found that mice that are resistant to social defeat stress display significant impairments in extinction learning and retention, suggesting that continued social interaction following the experience of social defeat may be associated with maladaptive fear responses. Here, we examined how individual differences in response to social defeat may be related to differences in cued and context fear discrimination. Following defeat, resistant mice showed increased fear to a neutral cued stimulus (CS-) compared to control and susceptible mice, but were still able to significantly discriminate between the CS+ and CS-. Likewise, both phenotypes were generally able to discriminate between the training context and neutral context at all retention intervals tested (1, 5, 14 days). However, susceptible mice displayed significantly better discrimination compared to resistant and non-defeated control mice when assessing the discrimination ratio. Thus, at a time when most animals begin exhibiting generalization to contextual cues, susceptible mice retain the ability to discriminate between fearful and neutral contexts. These data suggest that the differences observed in context and cued discrimination between susceptible and resistant mice may be related to differences in their coping strategies in response to social defeat. In particular, resistance or resilience to social defeat as traditionally characterized may be associated with altered inhibitory learning. Understanding why individual differences arise in response to stress, including social confrontation is important in understanding the development and treatment of stress related pathologies such as PTSD.
(Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: