Not the time or the place: the missing spatio-temporal link in publicly available genetic data.

Autor: Pope LC; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia., Liggins L; Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, New Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Institute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, 0745, New Zealand.; Auckland War Memorial Museum, Tāmaki Paenga Hira, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand., Keyse J; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia., Carvalho SB; CIBIO/InBIO - Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, R. Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal., Riginos C; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Molecular ecology [Mol Ecol] 2015 Aug; Vol. 24 (15), pp. 3802-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 23.
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13254
Abstrakt: Genetic data are being generated at unprecedented rates. Policies of many journals, institutions and funding bodies aim to ensure that these data are publicly archived so that published results are reproducible. Additionally, publicly archived data can be 'repurposed' to address new questions in the future. In 2011, along with other leading journals in ecology and evolution, Molecular Ecology implemented mandatory public data archiving (the Joint Data Archiving Policy). To evaluate the effect of this policy, we assessed the genetic, spatial and temporal data archived for 419 data sets from 289 articles in Molecular Ecology from 2009 to 2013. We then determined whether archived data could be used to reproduce analyses as presented in the manuscript. We found that the journal's mandatory archiving policy has had a substantial positive impact, increasing genetic data archiving from 49 (pre-2011) to 98% (2011-present). However, 31% of publicly archived genetic data sets could not be recreated based on information supplied in either the manuscript or public archives, with incomplete data or inconsistent codes linking genetic data and metadata as the primary reasons. While the majority of articles did provide some geographic information, 40% did not provide this information as geographic coordinates. Furthermore, a large proportion of articles did not contain any information regarding date of sampling (40%). Although the inclusion of spatio-temporal data does require an increase in effort, we argue that the enduring value of publicly accessible genetic data to the molecular ecology field is greatly compromised when such metadata are not archived alongside genetic data.
(© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: