A comparison of skin graft success in the head & neck with and without the use of a pressure dressing.

Autor: Dhillon M; Regional Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF Scotland, UK., Carter CP; Maxillofacial Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland, UK., Morrison J; Maxillofacial Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland, UK., Hislop WS; Maxillofacial Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland, UK., Currie WJ; Maxillofacial Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery [J Maxillofac Oral Surg] 2015 Jun; Vol. 14 (2), pp. 240-2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 11.
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0618-8
Abstrakt: Background: The success of skin grafting is dependent on the interplay between many factors including nutrient uptake and vascular in-growth. To allow this, it is important that the graft is immobile and traditionally a 'pressure dressing' has been placed over the graft to improve outcome and graft 'take'. We present the findings of our comparative study of full-thickness skin grafts performed in the head, neck and face region over a period of 24 months. We felt that there was an unacceptably high infection rate and graft failure using pressure dressings.
Methods: Data was collected retrospectively from the case notes on 70 patients who had undergone full-thickness skin grafting to the head, neck and face over a 2 year period. Thirty-five patients underwent grafting with pressure dressing and 35 without. The group with the pressure dressing had the same 'bolster' specification-type dressing and those without had their graft 'quilted' in and chloramphenicol ointment applied topically. Success was determined by the percentage 'take' of the grafts and absence of infection i.e. purulence.
Results: Infection in those with a pressure dressing stood at 26 % in contrast to those without, at 9 %. Without a pressure dressing we observed no total graft failures, compared to 6 % in those with a pressure dressing.
Conclusions: The results confirmed the perception that there was a higher infection and graft failure rate where a pressure dressing was applied; however, this was not a statistically significant difference and a randomised control trial with a larger sample size would be required to validate the results.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: