| Autor: |
Webster GD; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA., Peterson AC; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Arab journal of urology [Arab J Urol] 2015 Mar; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 17-23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 09. |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.aju.2015.01.002 |
| Abstrakt: |
A pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD) can present in varying lengths and degrees of complexity. In recent decades the repair of PFUDD has developed into a reliance on a perineal anastomotic approach for all but the most complex cases, which might still require an abdominal transpubic approach, or rarely a staged skin-inlay procedure. There is now controversy about the extent to which the perineal repair needs to be elaborated in individual patients. As originally described, the elaborated perineal approach comprises four steps that are used sequentially, as required, depending on the magnitude of the urethral defect. These steps are urethral mobilisation, corporal body separation, inferior wedge pubectomy and supra-crural urethral re-routing to the anastomosis. We present a review of the progressive repair, its reported use and outcomes and our recommendations for its continued use. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
