Effects of patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting in general practice: a cluster randomised trial.
Autor: | Verbakel NJ; Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Langelaan M; Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Verheij TJ; Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Wagner C; EMGO+ Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Zwart DL; Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners [Br J Gen Pract] 2015 May; Vol. 65 (634), pp. e319-29. |
DOI: | 10.3399/bjgp15X684853 |
Abstrakt: | Background: A constructive safety culture is essential for the successful implementation of patient safety improvements. Aim: To assess the effect of two patient safety culture interventions on incident reporting as a proxy of safety culture. Design and Setting: A three-arm cluster randomised trial was conducted in a mixed method study, studying the effect of administering a patient safety culture questionnaire (intervention I), the questionnaire complemented with a practice-based workshop (intervention II) and no intervention (control) in 30 general practices in the Netherlands. Method: The primary outcome, the number of reported incidents, was measured with a questionnaire at baseline and a year after. Analysis was performed using a negative binomial model. Secondary outcomes were quality and safety indicators and safety culture. Mixed effects linear regression was used to analyse the culture questionnaires. Results: The number of incidents increased in both intervention groups, to 82 and 224 in intervention I and II respectively. Adjusted for baseline number of incidents, practice size and accreditation status, the study showed that practices that additionally participated in the workshop reported 42 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.81 to 177.50) times more incidents compared to the control group. Practices that only completed the questionnaire reported 5 (95% CI = 1.17 to 25.49) times more incidents. There were no statistically significant differences in staff perception of patient safety culture at follow-up between the three study groups. Conclusion: Educating staff and facilitating discussion about patient safety culture in their own practice leads to increased reporting of incidents. It is beneficial to invest in a team-wise effort to improve patient safety. (© British Journal of General Practice 2015.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |