Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.

Autor: Orłowski M; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Ulica Karmelicka 7, 20-081 Lublin, Poland., Tarczydło B; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Ulica Karmelicka 7, 20-081 Lublin, Poland., Chałas R; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Ulica Karmelicka 7, 20-081 Lublin, Poland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: TheScientificWorldJournal [ScientificWorldJournal] 2015; Vol. 2015, pp. 701262. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 22.
DOI: 10.1155/2015/701262
Abstrakt: Objective: The aim of the study was to compare under in vitro conditions marginal sealing of 4 different bulk-fill materials composite restorations of class II.
Methods: Comparative evaluation concerned 4 composites of a bulk-fill type: SonicFill, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Filtek Bulk Fill, and SDR. The study used 30 third molars without caries. In each tooth 4 cavities of class II were prepared. The prepared tooth samples were placed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h, and after that in each restoration the depth of dye penetration along the side walls was evaluated.
Results: The highest rating (score 0, no dye penetration) was achieved by 93.33% of the restorations made of the SDR material, 90% of restorations of SonicFill system, 86.66% of restorations of the composite Filtek Bulk Fill, and 73.33% of restorations of the Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill.
Conclusion: The performed study showed that bulk-fill flowable or sonic-activated flowable composite restorations have better marginal sealing (lack of discoloration) in comparison with bulk-fill paste-like composite.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: