Target Controlled Infusion for non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: The first double blind randomized controlled trial.

Autor: Fanti L; Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: fanti.lorella@hsr.it., Gemma M; Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Agostoni M; Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Rossi G; Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Ruggeri L; Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Azzolini ML; Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Dabizzi E; Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Beretta L; Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy., Testoni PA; Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver [Dig Liver Dis] 2015 Jul; Vol. 47 (7), pp. 566-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 14.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.03.003
Abstrakt: Background: Target Controlled Infusion is a sophisticated tool for providing optimal sedation regimen avoiding under or oversedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Aims: To compare standard moderate sedation vs. non-anaesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial of 70 consecutive colonoscopies and 70 consecutive esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD). Standard group (n=70), received fentanyl (1 μg/kg)+midazolam (0.03-0.04 mg/kg) or midazolam only; propofol group (n=70), received fentanyl (1 μg/kg)+propofol Target Controlled Infusion (1.2-1.6 μg/ml) or propofol Target Controlled Infusion only. Discharge time, endoscopist satisfaction and patient satisfaction were recorded in all endoscopies.
Results: Colonoscopy: discharge time was significantly shorter in the propofol than the standard group (1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 5 ± 10.2 min, respectively; P=0.03). Endoscopist satisfaction was significantly higher (98.3 ± 11.4/100 vs. 87.2±12/100; P=0.001); patient satisfaction was significantly higher (95 ± 9.3/100 vs. 85.5 ± 14.4/100; P=0.002) in the propofol compared to the standard group. EGD: discharge time was not significantly different in the propofol and standard groups (1.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.9 ± 9.2 min, respectively; P=0.146). Endoscopist satisfaction was significantly higher (92.7 ± 14.3/100 vs. 82.8 ± 21.2/100; P=0.03); patient satisfaction was significantly higher (93.8 ± 18.2/100 vs. 76.5 ± 25.2/100; P=0.003). In the propofol group 94.3% of patients vs. 71.4% of patients in standard group asked to receive the same sedation in the future (P=0.021).
Conclusion: Target Controlled Infusion is a promising method for non-anaesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation.
(Copyright © 2015 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE