User reception of a simple online multisource feedback tool for residents.

Autor: Alofs L; Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box # 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Huiskes J; Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box # 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Heineman MJ; Center of Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Buis C; Medical Center, Alkmaar, The Netherlands., Horsman M; Family medicine practice, Utrecht, The Netherlands., van der Plank L; Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box # 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Ten Cate O; Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box # 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.j.tencate@umcutrecht.nl.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Perspectives on medical education [Perspect Med Educ] 2015 Apr; Vol. 4 (2), pp. 57-65.
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0173-0
Abstrakt: Receiving feedback on daily clinical activities, in whatever form, is crucial for the development of clinical proficiency. Multisource or 360-degree feedback procedures have been recommended to include various co-workers as sources of feedback. In 2008, a web-based multisource feedback (MSF) tool for medical residents was developed at the University Medical Center Utrecht and launched nationally in the Netherlands and has been widely used since then. In 2012, an evaluation was carried out to collect opinions on its use, on the quality of the instrument and on its experienced effectiveness. We approached 408 residents and 59 residency programme directors with an anonymous online survey.Completed surveys were received from 108 residents (26 %) and 22 programme directors (37 %). The tool was well received among the respondents and proved to be a simple, efficient and effective instrument to prepare for information-rich progress interviews of programme directors with their residents. Despite a relatively low response rate, indications were found for the effectiveness of MSF use at four levels of Kirkpatrick's hierarchy based on user impressions: reaction, learning, behaviour change, and impact. This MSF tool, designed for effective formative feedback, was found to meet its purpose and was well received.
Databáze: MEDLINE