Emergency treatment of haemorrhaging coeliac or mesenteric artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in the era of endovascular management.

Autor: Roberts KJ; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., McCulloch N; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Forde C; Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Mahon B; Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Mangat K; Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Olliff SP; Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Jones RG; Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: robert.jones@uhb.nhs.uk.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery [Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg] 2015 Apr; Vol. 49 (4), pp. 382-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 23.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.019
Abstrakt: Objectives: Patients requiring emergency treatment of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) can be treated by endovascular or surgical techniques. Outcomes after failed attempts at endovascular control are unclear as is the present role of surgery. This study reviewed treatment and outcomes of a contemporary cohort of patients with symptomatic VAAs at a tertiary referral centre.
Methods: Patients undergoing emergency treatment of a VAA of the coeliac, mesenteric arteries, or their branches were identified over a 5-year period. Patient variables, treatments, and outcomes were assessed.
Results: Forty-eight patients underwent 65 radiological and two surgical procedures. Pseuodaneuryms were present in 45 (94%) of patients. Interventional radiology procedures were the initial treatment in every patient. The initial success was 40 out of 48 (83%). Patients requiring more than one procedure were all successfully treated. Regarding initial failures, if the VAA sac could not be accessed at angiography an alternative procedure to control the VAA was required in every case. If initial endovascular treatment failed, repeating the same procedure was successful in half of the patients. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous VAA embolisation was used in four patients. The 30-day mortality was eight out of 48 (17%). There were four recorded complications including one death directly attributable to VAA treatment.
Conclusions: Patients needing emergency treatment of a VAA could be well served by non-surgical management. When the initial attempt at control of bleeding is unsuccessful it is important to consider non-conventional means of accessing these arteries. The need for surgery, in selected centres, may exist for a small group of patients after initial failed radiological treatment only.
(Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: