[Rectal dexmedetomidine in rats: evaluation of sedative and mucosal effects].

Autor:	Hanci V; Departamento de Anestesiologia e Reanimação, Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turquia. Electronic address: vhanci@gmail.com., Gülle K; Departamento de Histologia e Embriologia, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia., Karakaya K; Departamento de Cirurgia Geral, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia., Yurtlu S; Departamento de Anestesiologia e Reanimação, Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turquia., Akpolat M; Departamento de Histologia e Embriologia, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia., Yüce MF; Departamento de Anestesiologia e Reanimação, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia., Yüce FZ; Departamento de Histologia e Embriologia, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia., Turan IÖ; Departamento de Anestesiologia e Reanimação, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turquia.
Jazyk:	portugalština
Zdroj:	Revista brasileira de anestesiologia [Rev Bras Anestesiol] 2015 Jan-Feb; Vol. 65 (1), pp. 1-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Nov 01.
DOI:	10.1016/j.bjan.2013.09.004
Abstrakt:	Background and Objectives: In this study, we investigated the anesthetic and mucosal effects of the rectal application of dexmedetomidine to rats. Methods: Male Wistar albino rats weighing 250-300g were divided into four groups: Group S (n=8) was a sham group that served as a baseline for the normal basal values; Group C (n=8) consisted of rats that received the rectal application of saline alone; Group IPDex (n=8) included rats that received the intraperitoneal application of dexmedetomidine (100μgkg(-1)); and Group RecDex (n=8) included rats that received the rectal application of dexmedetomidine (100μgkg(-1)). For the rectal drug administration, we used 22G intravenous cannulas with the stylets removed. We administered the drugs by advancing the cannula 1cm into the rectum, and the rectal administration volume was 1mL for all the rats. The latency and anesthesia time (min) were measured. Two hours after rectal administration, 75mgkg(-1) ketamine was administered for intraperitoneal anesthesia in all the groups, followed by the removal of the rats' rectums to a distal distance of 3cm via an abdominoperineal surgical procedure. We histopathologically examined and scored the rectums. Results: Anesthesia was achieved in all the rats in the Group RecDex following the administration of dexmedetomidine. The onset of anesthesia in the Group RecDex was significantly later and of a shorter duration than in the Group IPDEx (p<0.05). In the Group RecDex, the administration of dexmedetomidine induced mild-moderate losses of mucosal architecture in the colon and rectum, 2h after rectal inoculation. Conclusion: Although 100μgkg(-1) dexmedetomidine administered rectally to rats achieved a significantly longer duration of anesthesia compared with the rectal administration of saline, our histopathological evaluations showed that the rectal administration of 100μgkg(-1) dexmedetomidine led to mild-moderate damage to the mucosal structure of the rectum. (Copyright © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu