| Autor: |
Zen BM; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Soares EF; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Rodrigues MA; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Luthi LF; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Consani RL; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Mesquita MF; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil., Henriques GE; Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, São Paulo, Brazil. |
| Abstrakt: |
The aim of this study was to evaluate 3 transfer techniques used to obtain working casts of implant-supported prostheses through the marginal misfit and strain induced to metallic framework. Thirty working casts were obtained from a metallic master cast, each one containing 2 implant analogs simulating a clinical situation of 3-unit implant-supported fixed prostheses according to the following transfer impression techniques: group A, squared transfers splinted with dental floss and acrylic resin, sectioned, and re-splinted; group B, squared transfers splinted with dental floss and bis-acrylic resin; and group N, squared transfers not splinted. A metallic framework was made for marginal misfit and strain measurements from the metallic master cast. The misfit between the metallic framework and working casts was evaluated with an optical microscope following the single-screw test protocol. In the same conditions, the strain was evaluated using strain gauges placed on the metallic framework. The data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test (α = 5%). For both marginal misfit and strain, there were statistically significant differences between groups A and N (P < .01) and groups B and N (P < .01), with greater values for group N. According to the Pearson test, there was a positive correlation between the misfit and strain variables (r = 0.5642). The results of this study showed that the impression techniques with splinted transfers promoted better accuracy than the nonsplinted technique, regardless of the splinting material used. |
