A nationwide survey of trauma center information technology leverage capacity for mental health comorbidity screening.

Autor:	Van Eaton EG; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: vane@u.washington.edu., Zatzick DF; Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Gallagher TH; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Tarczy-Hornoch P; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Rivara FP; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Flum DR; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Peterson R; Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA., Maier RV; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of the American College of Surgeons [J Am Coll Surg] 2014 Sep; Vol. 219 (3), pp. 505-10.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Apr 21.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.032
Abstrakt:	Background: Despite evidence that electronic medical record (EMR) information technology innovations can enhance the quality of trauma center care, few investigations have systematically assessed United States (US) trauma center EMR capacity, particularly for screening of mental health comorbidities. Study Design: Trauma programs at all US level I and II trauma centers were contacted and asked to complete a survey regarding health information technology (IT) and EMR capacity. Results: Three hundred ninety-one of 525 (74%) US level I and II trauma centers responded to the survey. More than 90% of trauma centers reported the ability to create custom patient tracking lists in their EMR. Forty-seven percent of centers were interested in automating a blood alcohol content screening process; only 14% reported successfully using their EMR to perform this task. Marked variation was observed across trauma center sites with regard to the types of EMR systems used as well as rates of adoption and turnover of EMR systems. Conclusions: Most US level I and II trauma centers have installed EMR systems; however, marked heterogeneity exists with regard to EMR type, available features, and turnover. A minority of centers have leveraged their EMR for screening of mental health comorbidities among trauma inpatients. Greater attention to effective EMR use is warranted from trauma accreditation organizations. (Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu