[Is there an appropriate bispectral index for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in spontaneous breathing in the pediatric patient?].

Autor: Alados-Arboledas FJ; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, UGC de Pediatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España. Electronic address: fjaladosarbol@hotmail.com., Millán-Bueno MP; UGC de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España., Expósito-Montes JF; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, UGC de Pediatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España., Arévalo-Garrido A; Sección de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, UGC de Pediatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España., Pérez-Parras A; Sección de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, UGC de Pediatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España., de la Cruz-Moreno J; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos, UGC de Pediatría, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, España.
Jazyk: English; Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj: Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion [Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim] 2015 Mar; Vol. 62 (3), pp. 133-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jul 19.
DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.03.014
Abstrakt: Objective: The bispectral index (BIS) values that predict appropriate anesthetic level to perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in spontaneous breathing are not well established in Pediatrics. The objective of this study is to determine whether it is possible to find an appropriate, less profound, BIS level in the pediatric patient that would enable an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) to be performed in spontaneous breathing without causing gag reflex or motor response.
Material and Method: A prospective study was designed and included 61 patients from 12-167 months old, and an ASAI-II who needed a diagnostic UGE. The study was conducted from October 2011 to March 2013.
Intervention: UGE performed with an anesthetic protocol using propofol. The vital signs measured were heart and respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure. The sedation level score (Ramsay scale) and BIS values were also measured. The first attempt was performed at BIS level 60-69, and this was not feasible, then the anesthetic was deepened and a second attempt made at BIS level 50-59. If this was still not possible a deeper anesthetic level was then achieved and a third attempt made at BIS level 45-49. Variables of interest were: effective BIS level (eBIS), BIS level at which UGE was performed without gag reflex or motor response; propofol total dose (mgkg(-1)), induction time (time from onset of sedation to effective start of UGE). A logistic regression analysis was performed to obtain an equation to estimate the possibility of UGE success.
Results: The distribution of the patient was: male 40%, female 60%, with 11 (18%) patients under 36 months. The statistical values are expressed as mean and standard deviation, with following results; age (months): 95.9±45.86; weight (kg): 30.5±14.68; effective BIS: 56.41±4.63; induction time (minutes): 11.07±2.69; total propofol dose (per kg): 4.86±1.21. An additional intra-procedure propofol bolus was given in 38 patients (62%), with 7/38 of them (18%) due to movement, and 31/38 (82%) due to BIS level increase. No statistical differences were found in effective BIS level between older and younger patients.
Conclusions: According to the results, BIS levels below 59 predict UGE success, with 72.13% sensitivity and 88.06% specificity in the pediatric population studied.
(Copyright © 2013 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE