| Autor: |
Lowe BK; Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801., Gerlemann GD; Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211., Carr SN; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140., Rincker PJ; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140., Schroeder AL; Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI 49007., Petry DB; Triumph Foods, St. Joseph, MO 64504., McKeith FK; Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801., Allee GL; Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211., Dilger AC; Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801 adilger2@illinois.edu. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of animal science [J Anim Sci] 2014 Aug; Vol. 92 (8), pp. 3727-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Jul 08. |
| DOI: |
10.2527/jas.2013-7516 |
| Abstrakt: |
Growth performance and carcass characteristics of physically castrated (PC) and immunologically castrated (IC) pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC; 5 mg/kg) were evaluated in 64 pens of 22 pigs each. Male pigs were randomly assigned to castration method at birth. Pigs in the PC group were physically castrated at 5 d of age while IC pigs were administered Improvest at 11 and 18 wk of age. Pigs entered the grow-finish barn at approximately 9 wk of age (d 0). Dietary treatments (control or RAC) were initiated on d 87. Final treatment arrangement was a 2 × 2 factorial of castration method and diet. Data were analyzed using a mixed model with fixed effects of castration method, diet, market group, and all 2- and 3-way interactions. Pen was the experimental unit. From d 0 to 65, IC pigs had 11.2% greater (P < 0.01) G:F and 11.6% less (P < 0.01) ADFI than PC pigs, but ADG was increased 1.0% in PC pigs compared with IC pigs (P < 0.01). From d 65 to 87, IC pigs had 7.9% greater (P < 0.01) ADG and 12.1% greater (P < 0.01) G:F than PC pigs while having similar (P = 0.16) ADFI. At the initiation of diet (RAC) treatments, BW of all treatments were similar (P ≥ 0.32). From d 87 to 120 (RAC feeding period), IC pigs had 10.0% greater (P < 0.01) ADG and 10.5% greater (P < 0.01) ADFI than PC pigs while having similar (P = 0.64) G:F. Feeding RAC increased (P < 0.01) ADG by 16.9% and G:F by 17.9% while having no effect (P = 0.42) on ADFI from d 87 to 120. There were no significant interactions between castration method and diet on growth performance from d 87 to 120. For the entire study (d 0-120), IC pigs had 2.6% greater (P < 0.01) ADG, 4.6% less (P < 0.01) ADFI, and 7.3% greater (P < 0.01) G:F than PC pigs. Averaged over market groups, IC pigs were 2.5 kg heavier (P < 0.01) and had similar (P = 0.10) carcass weights and 1.8 percentage units less (P < 0.01) dressing yields than PC pigs. Additionally, IC pigs had 1.3 mm less (P < 0.01) fat and 1.7 mm less (P < 0.01) loin depth than PC pigs. Pigs fed RAC were 2.9 kg heavier (P < 0.01) and had 2.3 kg heavier (P < 0.01) carcasses and 2.2 mm deeper (P < 0.01) loins but similar (P = 0.21) dressing yields and tended (P < 0.10) to have 0.4 mm less fat than control-fed pigs when averaged over market groups. Group 3 pigs were the heaviest (P < 0.01) at slaughter and had the heaviest (P < 0.01) carcasses, greatest (P < 0.01) dressing yields, and the most (P < 0.01) carcass fat of all market groups. Overall, immunological castration and RAC were additive in terms of improving growth performance and carcass characteristics. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
