Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04.
Autor: | Woodward WA, Sneige N, Winter K, Kuerer HM, Hudis C, Rakovitch E, Smith BL, Pierce LJ, Germano I, Pu AT, Walker EM, Grisell DL, White JR, McCormick B |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of clinical pathology [J Clin Pathol] 2014 Sep; Vol. 67 (9), pp. 777-80. |
DOI: | 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370 |
Abstrakt: | Aims: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk pathology, an optional web based teaching tool was developed and a random sampling of 10% of submitted slides were reviewed by a central pathologist. Methods: Submitting pathologists were asked to use the web based teaching tool and submit an assessment of the tool along with the pathology specimen form and DCIS H&E stained slide. Per protocol pathology was centrally reviewed for 10% of the cases. Results: Of the 55 DCIS cases reviewed, three had close or positive margins and three were assessed to include grade 3 DCIS, therefore 95% of DCIS cases reviewed were correctly graded, and 89% reviewed were pathologically appropriate for enrolment. Regarding the teaching tool, 13% of DCIS cases included forms that indicated the website was used. One of these seven who used the website submitted DCIS of grade 3. Conclusions: Central review demonstrates high pathological concordance with enrolment eligibility, particularly with regard to accurate grading. The teaching tool appeared to be underused. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |