Evaluation of two cooling systems under a firefighter coverall.

Autor: Teunissen LP; TNO, PO Box 23, 3769 ZG Soesterberg, The Netherlands., Wang LC; Taiwan Textile Research Institute, No. 6, Chengtian Rd., Tucheng Dist., New Taipei City 23674, Taiwan, ROC., Chou SN; Taiwan Textile Research Institute, No. 6, Chengtian Rd., Tucheng Dist., New Taipei City 23674, Taiwan, ROC., Huang CH; Taiwan Textile Research Institute, No. 6, Chengtian Rd., Tucheng Dist., New Taipei City 23674, Taiwan, ROC., Jou GT; Taiwan Textile Research Institute, No. 6, Chengtian Rd., Tucheng Dist., New Taipei City 23674, Taiwan, ROC., Daanen HA; TNO, PO Box 23, 3769 ZG Soesterberg, The Netherlands; MOVE Research Institute, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: hein.daanen@tno.nl.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2014 Nov; Vol. 45 (6), pp. 1433-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 May 03.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.008
Abstrakt: Firemen often suffer from heat strain. This study investigated two chest cooling systems for use under a firefighting suit. In nine male subjects, a vest with water soaked cooling pads and a vest with water perfused tubes were compared to a control condition. Subjects performed 30 min walking and 10 min recovery in hot conditions, while physiological and perceptual parameters were measured. No differences were observed in heart rate and rectal temperature, but scapular skin temperature and fluid loss were lower using the perfused vest. Thermal sensation was cooler for the perfused vest than for the other conditions, while the cool pad vest felt initially cooler than control. However, comfort and RPE scores were similar. We conclude that the cooling effect of both tested systems, mainly providing a (temporally) cooler thermal sensation, was limited and did not meet the expectations.
(Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE