Outcome and quality of screening in a nationwide survey on retinopathy of prematurity in The Netherlands.

Autor:	van Sorge AJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands., Termote JU; Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Simonsz HJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, Southern Holland, The Netherlands., Kerkhoff FT; Department of Ophthalmology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Limburg, The Netherlands., van Rijn LJ; Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, North-Holland, The Netherlands., Lemmens WA; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Schalij-Delfos NE; Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The British journal of ophthalmology [Br J Ophthalmol] 2014 Aug; Vol. 98 (8), pp. 1056-60. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Mar 28.
DOI:	10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304493
Abstrakt:	Purpose: Provide insight in natural history, screening and treatment policy of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in The Netherlands. Methods: A multicentre, prospective, population-based study (NEDROP) included all preterm infants born in 2009 in The Netherlands fulfilling the inclusion criteria for ROP screening. Anonymised data from ophthalmologists, neonatologists and paediatricians were merged on identification number. Results: Of 2033 reported infants, 1688 (83%) were screened for ROP. ROP stage was reported in 100%, zone in 94.4% and plus disease in 83%. ROP developed in 324 (19.2%), mild ROP (stage 1-2) in 294 (17.4%), severe ROP (stage 3 or more) in 30 (1.8%) and 17 (1%) were treated. The initial screening examination was not performed within the required 42 days in 641 (38%). Date for follow-up was recorded 1973 times and accomplished within 3 days from the planned date in 1957 (99.2%). The chance of not being screened increased from 12.9% without transfer to another hospital to 23.5, 18.5 and 25% after 1, 2, or 3 transfers, respectively. Conclusions: The incidence of severe ROP and infants treated was low. NEDROP emphasises that timing of initial examination and transfer to another hospital are issues of concern within the screening process. (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu