Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions.

Autor:	Lai CK; Department of Psychology., Marini M; Department of Psychology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia., Lehr SA; Department of Psychology, Harvard University., Cerruti C; Department of Psychology, Harvard University., Shin JE; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University., Joy-Gaba JA; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University., Ho AK; Department of Psychology, Colgate University., Teachman BA; Department of Psychology., Wojcik SP; Department of Psychology, University of California., Koleva SP; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California., Frazier RS; Department of Psychology., Heiphetz L; Department of Psychology, Boston College., Chen EE; Department of Psychology, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology., Turner RN; Department of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast., Haidt J; Stern School of Business, New York University., Kesebir S; London Business School., Hawkins CB; Department of Psychology., Schaefer HS; Department of Psychology., Rubichi S; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia., Sartori G; Department of Psychology, University of Padua., Dial CM; Department of Psychology, Harvard University., Sriram N; Department of Psychology., Banaji MR; Department of Psychology, Harvard University., Nosek BA; Department of Psychology.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of experimental psychology. General [J Exp Psychol Gen] 2014 Aug; Vol. 143 (4), pp. 1765-85. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Mar 24.
DOI:	10.1037/a0036260
Abstrakt:	Many methods for reducing implicit prejudice have been identified, but little is known about their relative effectiveness. We held a research contest to experimentally compare interventions for reducing the expression of implicit racial prejudice. Teams submitted 17 interventions that were tested an average of 3.70 times each in 4 studies (total N = 17,021), with rules for revising interventions between studies. Eight of 17 interventions were effective at reducing implicit preferences for Whites compared with Blacks, particularly ones that provided experience with counterstereotypical exemplars, used evaluative conditioning methods, and provided strategies to override biases. The other 9 interventions were ineffective, particularly ones that engaged participants with others' perspectives, asked participants to consider egalitarian values, or induced a positive emotion. The most potent interventions were ones that invoked high self-involvement or linked Black people with positivity and White people with negativity. No intervention consistently reduced explicit racial preferences. Furthermore, intervention effectiveness only weakly extended to implicit preferences for Asians and Hispanics. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu