Autor: |
Bizzi E; UOS of Rheumatology, S. Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Via cassia 600, 00189, Rome, Italy, Bizzi.emanuele@gmail.com., Massafra U, Laganà B, Bruzzese V, Diamanti AP, Cassol M, Migliore A |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Clinical rheumatology [Clin Rheumatol] 2014 Jul; Vol. 33 (7), pp. 877-84. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 08. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s10067-014-2504-7 |
Abstrakt: |
Several scores are currently used to estimate the radiologic progression of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Modified Sharp score, Genant-modified Sharp score and van der Heijde-modified Sharp score are actually the most commonly used scores in randomized controlled trials on biologic drugs actually available in scientific literature. An intensive literature search (EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE) was performed in order to identify randomized controlled studies reporting on the efficacy of biologic drugs on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis by means of approved scoring methods such as Sharp score variants. All studies were evaluated for their approach to radiologic outcome, and a global evaluation of trends towards radiologic evaluation was performed. Eighteen studies were identified and analyzed, and data from such randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported and described regarding their approach to radiologic outcomes. The use of three different scoring methodologies generated similar but non-comparable data; although a big part of the studies reported good efficacy profiles of several biologic drugs on radiologic progression, data from such studies are not comparable as the three different scoring methods are not convertible from one to another. At present, there is no standardization for the evaluation of radiologic outcomes, thus preventing comparison of results obtained by different drugs. The use of a single, standardized and widely approved scoring method would grant the possibility of comparing such data. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|