"Limits of control"--crucial parameters for a reliable quantification of viable campylobacter by real-time PCR.

Autor: Krüger NJ; National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany., Buhler C; National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany., Iwobi AN; Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany., Huber I; Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany., Ellerbroek L; National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany., Appel B; National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany., Stingl K; National Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2014 Feb 05; Vol. 9 (2), pp. e88108. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Feb 05 (Print Publication: 2014).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088108
Abstrakt: The unsuitability of the "CFU" parameter and the usefulness of cultivation-independent quantification of Campylobacter on chicken products, reflecting the actual risk for infection, is increasingly becoming obvious. Recently, real-time PCR methods in combination with the use of DNA intercalators, which block DNA amplification from dead bacteria, have seen wide application. However, much confusion exists in the correct interpretation of such assays. Campylobacter is confronted by oxidative and cold stress outside the intestine. Hence, damage caused by oxidative stress probably represents the most frequent natural death of Campylobacter on food products. Treatment of Campylobacter with peroxide led to complete loss of CFU and to significant entry of any tested DNA intercalator, indicating disruption of membrane integrity. When we transiently altered the metabolic state of Campylobacter by abolishing the proton-motive force or by inhibiting active efflux, CFU was constant but enhanced entry of ethidium bromide (EtBr) was observed. Consistently, ethidium monoazide (EMA) also entered viable Campylobacter, in particular when nutrients for bacterial energization were lacking (in PBS) or when the cells were less metabolically active (in stationary phase). In contrast, propidium iodide (PI) and propidium monoazide (PMA) were excluded from viable bacterial cells, irrespective of their metabolic state. As expected for a diffusion-limited process, the extent of signal reduction from dead cells depended on the temperature, incubation time and concentration of the dyes during staining, prior to crosslinking. Consistently, free protein and/or DNA present in varying amounts in the heterogeneous matrix lowered the concentration of the DNA dyes at the bacterial membrane and led to considerable variation of the residual signal from dead cells. In conclusion, we propose an improved approach, taking into account principles of method variability and recommend the implementation of process sample controls for reliable quantification of intact and potentially infectious units (IPIU) of Campylobacter by real-time PCR.
Databáze: MEDLINE