The impact of blood pressure variability on subclinical ventricular, renal and vascular dysfunction, in patients with hypertension and diabetes.
Autor: | Ciobanu AO; 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Gherghinescu CL; 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Dulgheru R; 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania., Magda S; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Dragoi Galrinho R; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Florescu M; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Guberna S; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Cinteza M; 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania., Vinereanu D; 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; Cardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Maedica [Maedica (Bucur)] 2013 Jun; Vol. 8 (2), pp. 129-36. |
Abstrakt: | Background: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was proved as a cardiovascular risk factor. One of its mechanisms is related to arterial stiffness and ventriculo-arterial coupling; however its impact on subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction has not been evaluated yet. Objectives: To assess the relationship between BPV on 24 hours, and subclinical left ventricle (LV), renal, and vascular dysfunction in diabetic and hypertensive patients. Material and Methods: We studied 56 patients (57±9 years, 29 men) with mild-to-moderate hypertension and type 2 diabetes, no cardiovascular disease, normal ejection fraction and normal renal function. 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was used to assess BPV, daytime (d) and night time (n), by: 1. mean (M); 2. standard deviation of mean (SD); 3. variance (Vr); 4. coefficient of variation (CV); 5. day/night variation: reverse dippers, non-dippers, dippers and extreme dippers; conventional and 2D speckle tracking echo to assess LV function; myocardial deformation was measured as global longitudinal strain (GLS). Endothelial (flow mediated dilation, FMD) and arterial function (intima media-thickness, IMT; pulse wave velocity, PWV), microalbuminuria were tested. Outcomes: Daytime BPV correlates inversely with subclinical myocardial function evaluated through GLS. Daytime systolic BPV correlates positively with IMT (all rho > 0.30, all p < 0.05). Also, there is a significantly inverse correlation between mean BP and GLS. We found a direct correlation between mean BP, but not BPV, and microalbuminuria (all rho > - 0.30 and all p < 0.05). We found no correlation between BPV and FMD, PWV. There were no differences for GLS, microalbuminuria and FMD between dipper groups. Conclusions: In diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, increased daytime blood pressure variability correlates with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction and arterial function (IMT), while microalbuminuria correlates with elevated blood pressure, but not with blood pressure variability. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |