Impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review protocol.

Autor: Munce SE; Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada. sarah.munce@utoronto.ca, Perrier L, Tricco AC, Straus SE, Fehlings MG, Kastner M, Jang E, Webster F, Jaglal SB
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2013 Feb 22; Vol. 2, pp. 14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 22.
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-14
Abstrakt: Background: After a spinal cord injury, quality of life, as well as the determinants of quality of life, has been widely assessed. However, to date, there have been no systematic reviews on the impact of quality improvement strategies, including self-management strategies, on the quality of life and well-being of individuals with a spinal cord injury. The current protocol outlines a strategy for a systematic review that aims to identify, assess, and synthesize evidence on the impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury.
Methods/design: All study designs, except qualitative studies will be included. Studies reporting on quality improvement including audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement among individuals with spinal cord injury will be included. The primary outcome is quality of life. The secondary outcomes are physical and psychological well-being. Studies will be included regardless of publication status, year of dissemination, or language of dissemination. Potentially relevant articles not written in English will be translated. We will search Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. The use of these databases will be supplemented by other data sources, including unpublished data. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (that is, health system, health-care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variable, such as etiology of spinal cord condition or by sex. If deemed appropriate, a meta-analysis will be conducted.
Discussion: This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health-care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life and well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury. Knowledge and application of such quality improvement strategies may reduce inappropriate health-care utilization costs, such as acute care inpatient readmission in the years post injury. Prospero registry number: CRD42012003058.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: