Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: is there a common link with calcification and inflammation?
Autor: | Dweck MR; Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK. mdweck@staffmail.ed.ac.uk, Khaw HJ, Sng GK, Luo EL, Baird A, Williams MC, Makiello P, Mirsadraee S, Joshi NV, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | European heart journal [Eur Heart J] 2013 Jun; Vol. 34 (21), pp. 1567-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 07. |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/eht034 |
Abstrakt: | Aims: The pathophysiology of aortic stenosis shares many similarities with atherosclerosis and skeletal bone formation. Using non-invasive imaging, we compared aortic valve calcification and inflammation activity with that measured in atherosclerosis and bone. Methods and Results: Positron emission and computed tomography was performed using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF, calcification) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG, inflammation) in 101 patients with calcific aortic valve disease (81 aortic stenosis and 20 aortic sclerosis). Calcium scores and positron emission tomography tracer activity (tissue-to-background ratio; TBR) were measured in the aortic valve, coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and bone. Over 90% of the cohort had coexistent calcific atheroma, yet correlations between calcium scores were weak or absent (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.015, P = 0.222; valve vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.039, P = 0.049) as were associations between calcium scores and bone mineral density (BMD vs. valve r(2) = 0.000, P = 0.766; vs. aorta r(2) = 0.052, P = 0.025; vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.016, P = 0.210). 18F-NaF activity in the valve was 28% higher than in the aorta (TBR: 2.66 ± 0.84 vs. 2.11 ± 0.31, respectively, P < 0.001) and correlated more strongly with the severity of aortic stenosis (r(2) = 0.419, P < 0.001) than 18F-NaF activity outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.167, P < 0.001; valve vs. coronary arteries r(2) = 0.174, P < 0.001; valve vs. bone r(2) = 0.001, P = 0.806). In contrast, 18F-FDG activity was lower in the aortic valve than the aortic atheroma (TBR: 1.56 ± 0.21 vs. 1.81 ± 0.24, respectively, P < 0.001) and more closely associated with uptake outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.327, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with aortic stenosis, disease activity appears to be determined by local calcific processes within the valve that are distinct from atherosclerosis and skeletal bone metabolism. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |