Autor: |
Priehs DR; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0126., Gum GG, Whitley RD, Moore LE |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
American journal of veterinary research [Am J Vet Res] 1990 Oct; Vol. 51 (10), pp. 1547-50. |
Abstrakt: |
The Mackay-Marg, Tono-Pen, and Challenger applanation tonometers were evaluated in vivo in 12 clinically normal eyes of 6 dogs. Tonometric measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared with closed manometric IOP measurements from the anterior chamber of anesthetized dogs. The tonometers were evaluated at IOP that ranged from 5 to 100 mm of Hg. The Mackay-Marg tonometer was the most reliable instrument when evaluated at IOP from 5 to 100 mm of Hg (r2 = 0.996) and from 10 to 30 mm of Hg (r2 = 0.962). The Tono-Pen tonometer was also reliable (r2 = 0.967) over the range of IOP, but consistently overestimated IOP at lower pressures and underestimated IOP at higher pressures. The Mackay-Marg and Tono-Pen measurements were essentially linear. When evaluated from 10 to 30 mm of Hg, r2 was 0.828 for the Tono-Pen tonometer. The Challenger tonometer, although reliable over the full range of IOP (r2 = 0.965), proved to be less accurate, as indicated by lack of a good linear equation. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|