Color and opacity of composites protected with surface sealants and submitted to artificial accelerated aging.
| Autor: | Aguilar FG; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo. Av do Café, s/nº - Monte Alegre - 14040-904 - Ribeirao Preto - SP - Brazil., Roberti Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Sousa AB, de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza F |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | European journal of dentistry [Eur J Dent] 2012 Jan; Vol. 6 (1), pp. 24-33. |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: To evaluate the color similarity, stability and opacity of composites (TPH, Charisma, and Concept, shade A2) protected with surface sealants (Fortify Plus and Biscover) and cyanoacrylate (Super Bonder). Methods: Forty specimens of each composite were made and separated into 4 groups (n=10) according to the surface protection: GI - without sealant; GII - cyanoacrylate; GIII - Fortify Plus; GIV - Biscover. Color and opacity readings were taken before and after Artificial Acelerated Aging (AAA) and the values obtained for color stability were submitted to statistical analysis by 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's test (P<.05). The values acquired for color similarity were submitted to 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P<.05). The specimen sufaces were compared before and after AAA using Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM). Results: Studied composites did not present the same values for the coordinates L*, a* and b * before AAA, indicating that there was no color similarity among them. All composites presented color alteration after AAA with clinically unacceptable values. Protected groups presented lower opacity variation after AAA, in comparison with the control goup. SEM evaluation demonstrated that AAA increased the surface irregularities in all of the studied groups. Conclusion: Surface sealants were not effective in maintaining composite color, but were able to maintain opacity. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|