Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center.
| Autor: | Jayram G; Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. gautam.jayram@uchospitals.edu, Decastro GJ, Large MC, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, Brendler CB |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of endourology [J Endourol] 2011 Mar; Vol. 25 (3), pp. 455-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Jan 15. |
| DOI: | 10.1089/end.2010.0349 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer have historically been treated with multimodal therapy and considered poor candidates for minimally invasive surgery. We reviewed our experiences with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with high-risk clinical features. Materials and Methods: Clinical database review identified high-risk patients undergoing RARP by two high-volume robotic surgeons. D'Amico's criteria for high-risk prostate cancer were utilized: prostate-specific antigen ≥ 20 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ T2c, or preoperative Gleason grade ≥ 8. About 148 patients were identified in the study group. Mean age at surgery was 60.9 years, and mean body mass index was 27.9. Mean estimated blood loss was 150 cc and the transfusion rate was 2.7%. Median hospital stay was 1 day and the rate of major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3) was 3.4%. Results: Bilateral nerve preservation was feasible in 28.4%, and the rate of positive surgical margins was 20.9%. Final pathology demonstrated extra-capsular disease in 54.1% of patients and 12.3% had lymph node involvement. At 2 years of follow-up, 21.3% of patients had experienced biochemical recurrence or had persistent disease after treatment. Continence was 91.2% (1 pad or less) and total impotence (inability to masturbate) was 48.3%. Conclusions: RARP does not compromise oncologic or functional outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Although long-term study is necessary to validate oncologic and functional outcomes, our data suggest that the presence of high-risk disease is not a contraindication to a minimally invasive approach for radical prostatectomy at experienced centers. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|