| Autor: |
Swearengen JR; National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA. swearengenj@nbacc.net, Vargas KJ, Tate MK, Linde NS |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
ILAR journal [ILAR J] 2010; Vol. 51 (2), pp. 120-6. |
| DOI: |
10.1093/ilar.51.2.120 |
| Abstrakt: |
Preparing for the wide variety of disasters that can occur is challenging for any animal research facility, but the level of concern for human and animal health rises significantly when infectious agents and toxins are part of the scenario. Federal regulations provide detailed requirements for the development of an incident response plan (IRP) when select agents and toxins (SATs) are used. In addition to the usual issues associated with disaster planning, the IRP must address concerns associated with the potential theft, loss, or release of SATs that may affect both institutional personnel and the surrounding community. The level of detail in the IRP and the intensity of training should be appropriate for the level of risk involved. Regulations describe certain basic requirements but do not address the risks of SAT-exposed animals, which have been the subject of additional guidance to help implement regulatory requirements. A 2008 joint publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service describes scenarios in which SAT-exposed animals are handled in the same manner as the agent or toxin itself for the purpose of reporting a SAT theft, loss, or release. Events that resulted from the impact of Hurricane Ike at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston provide a valuable opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the federal regulations and to build on lessons learned from this disaster. These lessons can help to supplement the regulatory requirements and improve the safety and security of handling both SATs and animals exposed to them during and after an emergency situation. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
