Autor: |
Kong C; Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics (CSTAR), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada., Trejos AL, Naish MD, Patel RV, Leitch KK |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Surgical innovation [Surg Innov] 2010 Mar; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 5-10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Dec 24. |
DOI: |
10.1177/1553350609357187 |
Abstrakt: |
This study compares 3 different saw types to determine which is best suited for integration into a minimally invasive bone saw. A handheld electric jigsaw, a coping saw, and a Gigli saw were used to cut into porcine ilium. Heat generated was measured using a thermocouple, and forces applied during cutting were recorded using a force/torque sensor. The coping saw generated an average maximum temperature that was 26 degrees C less than that generated using the jigsaw (P < .001) and 14 degrees C less than that for the Gigli saw (P < .001). On average, the maximum force applied through the coping saw was 14 N less than that through the jigsaw (P < .001) and 18 N less than that through the Gigli saw (P < .001). Out of the 3 saws tested, the coping saw is optimal for cutting bone based on heat generation and required force. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|