[Locator or ball attachment: a guide for clinical decision making].

Autor: Büttel AE; Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Myoarthropathien, Universitätskliniken für Zahnmedizin, Universität Basel, Schweiz. adrian.buettel@unibas.ch, Bühler NM, Marinello CP
Jazyk: French; German
Zdroj: Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia [Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed] 2009; Vol. 119 (9), pp. 901-18.
Abstrakt: Various attachments are available to retain overdentures on natural roots or implants. Technical aspects, the clinical handling, the capability to adapt or repair and the costs are parameters to be considered when choosing the appropriate attachment. Ball attachments and bars are clinically established and well documented. Ball attachments as prefabricated, unsplinted units are easily replaceable and show hygienic advantages, while bars show favorable stability. The Locator is a newer, popular clinical alternative to these established attachments. The ball attachment and the Locator are compared from a technical and clinical point of view.
Databáze: MEDLINE