In vitro and in vivo anticancer effects of the novel vitamin E ether analogue RRR-alpha-tocopheryloxybutyl sulfonic acid in prostate cancer.
| Autor: | Ni J; Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA., Mai T, Pang ST, Haque I, Huang K, DiMaggio MA, Xie S, James NS, Kasi D, Chemler SR, Yeh S |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research [Clin Cancer Res] 2009 Feb 01; Vol. 15 (3), pp. 898-906. |
| DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1087 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: Among derivatives of alpha-vitamin E, alpha-vitamin E succinate (VES), has attracted much attention due to its potent anti-prostate cancer activity in vitro and in vivo. However, the in vivo antitumor activity of VES might be compromised if administrated orally due to the VES hydrolysis by esterases in the gastrointestinal tract. Experimental Design: New nonhydrolyzable VES ether analogues were synthesized and their growth inhibition was screened by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide growth assay. Among them, RRR-alpha-tocopheryloxybutyl sulfonic acid (VEBSA) was further characterized by terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling apoptosis assay, soft agar assay, and in vivo tumor formation. Results: VEBSA has potent antitumor ability, albeit to a lesser extent than VES, in in vitro cultured prostate cancer LNCaP and PC3 cells. Like VES, VEBSA induced apoptosis, repressed androgen receptor protein expression, and enhanced vitamin D receptor expression, suggesting that VEBSA can go through mechanisms similar to those used by VES to inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro. However, 6 weeks of oral consumption of VEBSA, but not of VES, reduced the tumor burden in the xenografted prostate tumors in nude mice. Furthermore, oral intake of VEBSA for 20 weeks inhibited prostate tumor growth and progression more efficiently compared with VES in the prostate cancer tumor model of TRAMP mice. Conclusion: Oral consumption of VEBSA allows a greater anticancer activity compared with VES. Chemoprevention prefers the oral consumption of agents; the advantage of VEBSA over VES to be administrated orally will allow VEBSA to serve as an agent for both preventive and therapeutic purposes for prostate cancer. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|