| Autor: |
Terribile LC; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70.910-900 Brasília, DF, Brazil. levicarina@unb.br, Olalla-Tárraga MA, Morales-Castilla I, Rueda M, Vidanes RM, Rodríguez MA, Diniz-Filho JA |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Oecologia [Oecologia] 2009 Mar; Vol. 159 (3), pp. 617-26. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Dec 20. |
| DOI: |
10.1007/s00442-008-1244-2 |
| Abstrakt: |
Recent studies addressing broad-scale species richness gradients have proposed two main primary drivers: contemporary climate and evolutionary processes (differential balance between speciation and extinction). Here, we analyze the global richness patterns of two venomous snake clades, Viperidae and Elapidae. We used ordinary least squares multiple regression (OLS) and partial regression analysis to investigate to what extent actual evapotranspiration (AET; summarizing current environmental conditions) and biogeographical regions (representing evolutionary effects) were associated with species richness. For viperids, AET explained 45.6% of the variance in richness whereas the effect of this variable for elapids was almost null (0.5%). On the other hand, biogeographic regions were the best predictors of elapid richness (56.5%), against its relatively small effect (25.9%) in viperid richness. Partial regressions also revealed similar patterns for independent effects of climate and history in both clades. However, the independent historical effect in Elapidae decreased from 45.2 to 17.8% when we excluded Australia from the analyses, indicating that the strong historical effect that had emerged for the global richness pattern was reflecting the historical process of elapid radiation into Australia. Even after excluding Australia, the historical signal in elapid richness in the rest of the globe was still significant and much higher than that observed in viperid richness at a global scale (2.7% after controlling for AET effects). Differences in the evolutionary age of these two clades can be invoked to explain these contrasting results, in that viperids probably had more time for diversification, generating richness responses to environmental gradients, whereas the pattern of distribution of elapid richness can be more directly interpreted in an evolutionary context. Moreover, these results show the importance of starting to adopt deconstructive approaches to species richness, since the driving factors of these patterns may vary from group to group according to their evolutionary history. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink