[Quality assessment and improvement in the indication and management of parenteral nutrition in a general surgery unit].

Autor:	González Valverde FM; Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía. Murcia, España. migova@terra.es, Gómez Ramos MJ, Méndez Martínez M, Sánchez Alvarez C, Candel Arenas MF, Albarracín Marín-Blázquez A
Jazyk:	Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj:	Cirugia espanola [Cir Esp] 2008 Jun; Vol. 83 (6), pp. 313-9.
DOI:	10.1016/s0009-739x(08)70583-9
Abstrakt:	Objective: To analyze the degree of compliance with a variety of internationally accepted standards defined for Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) quality control in our Surgery Department. Patients and Method: Prospective study of patients treated with TPN over two years in the department of surgery of a university teaching hospital (n = 72). Assessment of quality was performed by measurements of compliance using 19 criteria. The criteria were divided into three groups according to characteristics of TPN standardisation: this must be "appropriate" to the nutritional requirements of the patient, "safe" in order to prevent complications and "accurate" in its daily programming. Corrective measures aimed at resolving the quality problem were applied to the deficient criteria over six months, paying particular attention to those criteria which had the highest percentage of errors in the study carried out using a Pareto analysis. During a third period of six months the information on all 19 criteria was gathered again and the improvement with regard to the standard values and to the compliance in the first period (using the value of z) was evaluated. Results: The compliance with seven criteria was significantly below standard values: all those of the "appropriate" group, except the criteria "type of diet" and "composition of the diet", and the criteria "absence of complications" of the "safe" group, which was also the one with the highest number of grouped non-compliances. In the second period all the below standard criteria improved with compared to the first period. The criteria "time of fasting", "concordance" and "duration" were significantly improved. The criteria "time of fasting", "duration" and "latency" reached the standard. The rest of criteria that reached their standard in the first evaluation maintained the same results. Conclusions: Corrective measures introduced were effective since all the below standard criteria improved, including metabolic complications. Notwithstanding, it is necessary to continue in this line to improve the criteria still below standard.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu