Serum pepsinogen I and II levels in various gastric disorders with special reference to their use as a screening test for carcinoma stomach.
| Autor: | Parthasarathy G; Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India., Maroju NK, Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N, Sridhar MG |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation [Trop Gastroenterol] 2007 Oct-Dec; Vol. 28 (4), pp. 166-70. |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction: The role of serum pepsinogen in the diagnosis of gastric carcinoma is well established. Its role in other common upper alimentary disorders has not been widely studied. The aim of this study was to describe the effect of various gastric disorders on the levels of pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio, with an emphasis on the diagnosis of carcinoma stomach in the South Indian population. Methods: A total of 210 patients in seven groups, including one control group, were studied. The groups included patients with carcinoma stomach, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, peptic ulcer, portal hypertensive gastropathy, non-ulcer dyspepsia and erosive gastritis. Serum pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio were estimated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. Results: Patients with carcinoma of the stomach, when compared with controls, had a significantly lower pepsinogen I level (87.2 microg/L vs. 158.1 microg/L, p=0.0002) and pepsinogen I/II ratio (4.3 vs. 7.2, p = 0.0001). No significant change in pepsinogen levels occurred in the other groups. The cut-off levels of pepsinogen I (115.3 microg/L) and pepsinogen I/II ratio (6.2), determined by THE ROC curve, when applied in parallel provided a sensitivity of 97% and a negative predictive value of 91.4% for the diagnosis of carcinoma stomach. When the tests were applied in parallel, the likelihood ratio of a negative test was 0.06, indicating that individuals without carcinoma stomach were 16 times more likely to have a negative test than those with carcinoma. This fulfilled the essential prerequisites of an ideal screening test. Conclusion: Serum pepsinogen estimation is a useful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of carcinoma stomach. The significance of serum pepsinogen level in portal hypertensive gastropathy, non-ulcer dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori gastritis and erosive gastritis was not established. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|