Rapid versus intermediate health impact assessment of foreshore development plans.
| Autor: | Furber SE; Division of Population Health and Planning, South East Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service. susan.furber@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au, Gray E, Harris-Roxas BF, Neville LM, Dews CL, Thackway SV |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | New South Wales public health bulletin [N S W Public Health Bull] 2007 Sep-Oct; Vol. 18 (9-10), pp. 174-6. |
| DOI: | 10.1071/nb07076 |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To describe the main differences between conducting a rapid health impact assessment (HIA) and an intermediate HIA on foreshore development plans and their feasibility from a health service perspective. Methods: A rapid HIA and an intermediate HIA were undertaken on two foreshore development plans. Results: The main differences between the two HIAs were in the identification, assessment and decision-making stages of the HIA. Conclusion: While the rapid HIA was less resource intensive than the intermediate HIA, there are several factors that affect the feasibility of conducting this type of HIA within a short time period. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|