| Autor: |
Vassiliou MC; Department of Surgery, McGill University, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada., Feldman LS, Fraser SA, Charlebois P, Chaudhury P, Stanbridge DD, Fried GM |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Surgical innovation [Surg Innov] 2007 Sep; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 211-6. |
| DOI: |
10.1177/1553350607308466 |
| Abstrakt: |
The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skill (GOALS) has been shown to meet high standards for direct observation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of GOALS when applied to blinded, videotaped performances. Five novice surgeons and 5 experienced surgeons were each evaluated by 2 observers during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Subsequently, 4 laparoscopists (V1 to V4) evaluated the videotaped procedures using GOALS. Two of the raters (V1 and V3) had prior experience using GOALS. The interrater reliabilities between video raters (VRs) and between VRs and direct raters (DRs) were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Construct validity was assessed using 2-way analysis of variance. Interrater reliability between the 4 VRs and the 2 DRs was 0.72. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the 4 VRs was 0.68 and for each VR compared with the mean DR was 0.86, 0.39, 0.94, and 0.76, respectively. All raters, except V2, differentiated between novice and experienced groups (P values ranged from .01 to .05). These data suggest that GOALS can be used to assess laparoscopic skill based on videotaped performances but that rater training may play an important role in ensuring the reliability and validity of the instrument. Experience with the tool in the operating room may improve the reliability of video rating and could be of value in training evaluators. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
