Open and laparoscopic approach in incisional hernia repair with ePTFE prosthesis.
| Autor: | Zografos GN; 3rd Department of Surgery, Athens General Hospital, Athens, Greece. gnzografos@yahoo.com, Mitropapas G, Vasiliadis G, Farfaras A, Ageli C, Margaris E, Tsipras I, Koliopanos A, Pateras J, Papastratis G |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A [J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A] 2007 Jun; Vol. 17 (3), pp. 277-81. |
| DOI: | 10.1089/lap.2006.0082 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of incisional hernia laparoscopic and open surgery, focusing on the morbidity and postoperative implications. Materials and Methods: A group of 106 (42 men, 64 women) patients suffering from incisional hernias were treated with either a laparoscopic (30) or an open (76) placement of a prosthetic mesh between January 1997 and December 2004. The age and gender of the patients, the size and type of the mesh, operation note, the length of postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity were recorded. Results: An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh was used in 103 patients, whereas a polypropylene mesh was used in 3 patients. In the open technique, 3 patients with the ePTFE prosthetic material developed a mesh infection and required a mesh removal, which was easily performed under local anesthesia. Moreover, 2 patients from the same group developed a hernia recurrence. As for the laparoscopic approach, the only complication observed was one hernia recurrence. Finally, it should be mentioned that 1 patient with a polypropylene mesh developed a colocutaneous fistula. Conclusions: The benefits of the laparoscopic mesh technique, compared to the open technique, include a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and possibly, a reduction in wound and mesh complications. Regarding the recurrence rate, the two techniques show similar results. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|