Coronary artery disease cannot be reliably evaluated by 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography.
Autor: | Bartnes K; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. kristian.bartnes@unn.no, Sildnes T, Iqbal A, Dahl-Eriksen O, Trovik T, Steigen TK, Mortensen R, Mannsverk JT, Sørlie DG, Myrmel T |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ [Scand Cardiovasc J] 2007 Jun; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 167-70. |
DOI: | 10.1080/14017430601120414 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: Angiography by selective catheterization is the standard method for coronary artery imaging but carries a risk of rare, but serious complications. We investigated whether 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) could substitute for selective angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease in surgically revascularized patients. Design: In a setting closely resembling routine clinical practice, 45 patients who had been operated with coronary artery bypass grafting 508-1135 (mean 811) days before were examined with MDCT and conventional selective angiography on the same day. The interpreters were blinded to the results of the parallel imaging modality. Results: Significant pathology (stenosis >/=50% or occlusion) in the larger coronary artery segments was detected by MDCT with a sensitivity of 70-98% (mean 87%) and a specificity of 0-37% (mean 21%). MDCT failed to identify three of ten left main stem stenoses. Conclusion: Sixteen-slice MDCT cannot routinely replace selective angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |