Validation of intracranial area as a surrogate measure of intracranial volume when using clinical MRI.
Autor: | Nandigam RN; Department of Neurology, Neurology Clinical Trials Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Chen YW, Gurol ME, Rosand J, Greenberg SM, Smith EE |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging [J Neuroimaging] 2007 Jan; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 74-7. |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00069.x |
Abstrakt: | Background and Purpose: We sought to determine whether mid-sagittal intracranial area (ICA) is a valid surrogate of intracranial volume (ICV) when using retrospective data with relatively thick (6-7 mm) sagittal slices. Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from 47 subjects who had two MRI scans taken at least nine months apart. Twenty-three subjects had manual segmentation of ICV on the T2-weighted sequence for comparison. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intraobserver, interobserver, and intraobserver scan-rescan comparisons were 0.96, 0.97 and 0.95. Pearson correlation coefficients between ICV and ICA, averaging the cumulative 1, 2, 3, and 4 most midline slices, were 0.89, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.95. There was a significant marginal increase in explained variance of ICV by measuring two, rather than one, slices (P= 0.001). Conclusions: These data suggest that ICA, even measured without high-resolution imaging, is a reasonable substitute for ICV. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |