| Abstrakt: |
The interaction of the coronary vasodilator dipyridamole with biological systems, protein and membranes has been studied through optical absorption and fluorescence spectroscopies. Using the analysis of the spectra and fluorescence intensity of dipyridamole (DIP) in solution, the interaction of this compound with the transport protein albumin (BSA) and with a model of cell membranes, namely micelles of lysophosphatidylcholine (L-PC), was investigated. Measurements were performed at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0 where the molecule of DIP is fully protonated and partially protonated, respectively. The quenching of fluorescence with nitroxide-stable radicals 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) and 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPOL) as well as with acrylamide and iodide allowed the localization of the drug in the polar interface of micelles. Quenching by acrylamide and iodide in L-PC micelles demonstrated the effect of micelle protonation which increased the accessibility of iodide to the chromophore. An effective association constant was obtained both at pH 7.0 (7.5 x 10(3) M-1) and pH 5.0 (2.5 x 10(3) M-1) and a very good agreement with the proposed binding model was observed. The quantum yields of fluorescence data agree very well with the fluorescence lifetimes. The measurement of lifetimes was important to understand the kinetic data obtained from Stern-Volmer plots both of radical, acrylamide and iodide quenching of fluorescence. It was observed that, in the presence of micelles, the kq value increased for TEMPO while decreased for TEMPOL. This result, together with the vanishing solubility of DIP in saturated hydrocarbons and the preferential partition of TEMPO in micelles, suggested the localization of DIP in the polar micellar interface. This is also supported by the enhanced iodide quenching at pH 5.0, constancy of acrylamide quenching in the range of pH 7.0-5.0 and the partition of TEMPO and TEMPOL in SDS micelles. The association constant of DIP to BSA was also estimated both at pH 7.0 (2 x 10(4) M-1) and pH 5.0 (4 x 10(3) M-1). Quenching studies with nitroxide radicals, acrylamide and iodide also suggested the binding of the drug to a hydrophobic region of the protein. At pH 5.0, the protein undergo a conformational change which leads to a loosening of the overall structure so that the accessibility of the nitroxide radicals for DIP is increased at this pH. The differences in kq values at pH 7.0 and pH 5.0 suggested that at pH 7.0 the chromophore is protected in the protein site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) |
