| Autor: |
McClune S; Department of Anaesthetics, Queen's University of Belfast, N. Ireland., McKay AC, Wright PM, Patterson CC, Clarke RS |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
British journal of anaesthesia [Br J Anaesth] 1992 Sep; Vol. 69 (3), pp. 240-5. |
| DOI: |
10.1093/bja/69.3.240 |
| Abstrakt: |
We gave either midazolam or propofol for induction of anaesthesia to 140 ASA I or II female patients (18-60 yr). ED50 values were obtained by probit analysis for three clinical end-points: loss of response to command; loss of eyelash reflex; failure to respond to application of an anaesthetic face mask delivering 1% isoflurane. Propofol ED50 values (95% confidence intervals) were 1.25 (0.99-1.48) mg kg-1, 1.61 (1.29-1.94) mg kg-1 and 1.51 (1.20-1.82) mg kg-1, respectively. ED50 values for midazolam were 0.26 (0.20-0.37) mg kg-1, 0.29 (0.23-0.47) mg kg-1 and 0.25 (0.20-0.32) mg kg-1, respectively. An additional 92 similar patients received one of nine dose combinations of midazolam and propofol for induction of anaesthesia, propofol being administered 2 min after midazolam. Success of induction was based on the clinical end-point of loss of response to command. Administration of 25% of the ED50 of midazolam followed by 50% of the ED50 of propofol resulted in loss of response to command in 50% of patients, while 50% of the ED50 of midazolam, followed by 25% of the ED50 of propofol had the same effect. A probit regression model specifying a synergistic interaction between midazolam and propofol fitted the data significantly better than a model specifying no interaction. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
