Comparison of superficial femoral vein and saphenous vein as conduits for mesenteric arterial bypass.

Autor:	Modrall JG; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, TX 75390-9157, USA. greg.modrall@utsouthwestern.edu, Sadjadi J, Joiner DR, Ali A, Welborn MB 3rd, Jackson MR, Valentine RJ, Clagett GP
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2003 Feb; Vol. 37 (2), pp. 362-6.
DOI:	10.1067/mva.2003.21
Abstrakt:	Purpose: Gangrenous bowel, intraabdominal sepsis, and previous failed mesenteric bypass are indications for use of an autogenous conduit for mesenteric arterial reconstruction. Saphenous vein (SV) is often used as the autogenous conduit of choice, but it may be prone to graft stenosis or occlusion. Recent experience with superficial femoral vein (SFV) suggests that it is an excellent alternative conduit for major arterial reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of SV and SFV for mesenteric arterial bypass. Methods: During a 7-year period, 26 patients underwent 43 mesenteric arterial bypass procedures with autogenous conduit. SV was used for 23 bypasses (53%), and SFV was used for 20 bypasses (47%). Indications for revascularization included chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 15; 58%), acute mesenteric ischemia (n = 9; 35%), and mycotic aneurysm of the paravisceral aorta (n = 2; 7%). Three patients (11%) underwent revascularization with SV grafts and two patients (8%) with SFV grafts after previous failed mesenteric bypass. Results: The 30-day mortality rate was 15%. Three deaths occurred after SV bypass for acute mesenteric ischemia, and one death occurred after a SFV bypass for a ruptured paravisceral mycotic aneurysm. Twenty-two surviving patients were followed for a mean of 31 +/- 6 months. Three of 11 patients (27%) who survived after SV bypass had recurrent mesenteric ischemia develop (acute, n = 1; chronic, n = 2) from graft thrombosis at a mean interval of 32 +/- 22 months after surgery. No patient had recurrent symptoms develop after SFV bypass. One of the three patients with SV graft failure died of acute mesenteric ischemia, and the other two patients underwent successful bypass with SFV. Symptomatic graft failure was significantly more likely to occur in patients receiving SV grafts compared with SFV grafts (P <.05). Conclusion: SFV yields acceptable clinical outcomes for mesenteric arterial bypass compared with SV. SFV is a viable alternative to SV when autogenous conduit is indicated for mesenteric arterial reconstruction.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu