The humoral immune response to macrocyclic chelating agent DOTA depends on the carrier molecule.
| Autor: | Perico ME; Unit of Molecular Therapies, Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy., Chinol M, Nacca A, Luison E, Paganelli G, Canevari S |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2001 Nov; Vol. 42 (11), pp. 1697-703. |
| Abstrakt: | Unlabelled: The chelating agent 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N', N",N"'-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) is used to label monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and peptides with (90)Y. DOTA allows the generation of clinically useful stable metallic radioconjugates for the treatment of a variety of tumors, but its immunogenicity has remained controversial. In this study, we evaluated the immune response to DOTA in a preclinical mouse model and in patients entered in a clinical trial. Methods: Sera were obtained from BALB/c mice injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with different doses and formulations of syngeneic and xenogeneic mAbs or peptide (murine mAb Mov19 [mM19]; its chimeric version; murine V/human C ChiMov19 [cM19]; or Tyr(3)-octreotide)-DOTA conjugates. Sera from patients with neuroendocrine tumors, enrolled in a protocol for somatostatin receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy with (90)Y-DOTA-D-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC), were also collected before and after each treatment. Levels and specificity of antibody response to relevant (Mov19, ChiMov19, or Tyr(3)-octreotide) and nonrelevant (human serum albumin) DOTA targets were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and competition assays. An anti-DOTA mAb (IgG1) derived from a ChiMov19-DOTA immunized mouse was used, in a competitive radioimmunoassay, to determine the efficiency of DOTA presentation on the different carriers. Results: Depending on the immunogenicity and dosage of the mAb, a specific anti-DOTA response was revealed in the preclinical system. However, DOTA-peptide conjugate induced no immune-detectable response against either chelator or carrier. DOTA was poorly presented on small peptides, as determined using the anti-DOTA mAb. Conclusion: A humoral response against DOTA is possible, but only as a consequence of the response elicited against the carrier. Octreotide was not immunogenic. Thus, (90)Y-DOTATOC can be considered a safe and useful tool for receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor-overexpressing tumors. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|