The 'Wing' versus the 'Vapor Cut' electrodes in transurethral electrovaporization-resection of the prostate: comparative changes in safety parameters.

Autor:	Talic RF; Division of Urology, College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. rftalic@ksu.edu.sa, Al Kudair WK, El Tiraifi AE, Al Bogami NM, Mansi MK, Altaf S, Hargreaves TB
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Urologia internationalis [Urol Int] 2000; Vol. 65 (2), pp. 95-9.
DOI:	10.1159/000064847
Abstrakt:	We compared the early safety features of two-band resection devices used in transurethral vaporization-resection of the prostate (TUVRP). Ninety patients with prostatic outflow obstruction were prospectively evaluated in two open studies for the treatment using the 'Wing' cutting electrode in group 1 (Richard Wolf, Germany) and the 'Vapor Cut' electrode in group 2 (Karl Storz, Germany). Patients in both groups were comparable in age, presentation, prostate size and blood parameters. Safety features evaluated included changes in serum hemoglobin, hematocrit, sodium concentration and incidence of side effects. The mean drop in hemoglobin, hematocrit and serum sodium 1 h postoperatively for the Wing group were 0.54 g/dl, 2.04 ml/dl and 0.084 mEq/l respectively compared to a mean drop of 1.1 g/dl, 3.07 ml/dl and 3.1 mEq/l in the Vapor Cut group. These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.004, 0.03 and <0.0001 respectively). The mean resection weight was 24.78 +/- 10.4 and 24.46 +/- 14.79 g in groups 1 and 2, respectively; however, the mean operation time was significantly longer in the Wing group (47.7 vs. 37.1 min, p = 0.003). We conclude that both loops were safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with prostatic outflow obstruction. Safety features that are related to the vaporization effect are influenced by the speed of resection. (Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu