Empirically supported treatments in pediatric psychology: constipation and encopresis.
| Autor: | McGrath ML; Department of Psychology, Tulane University, 2007 Percival Stern Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118-5698, USA. mmcgrath@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu, Mellon MW, Murphy L |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of pediatric psychology [J Pediatr Psychol] 2000 Jun; Vol. 25 (4), pp. 225-54; discussion 255-6. |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jpepsy/25.4.225 |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To review the empirical research examining behavioral and medical treatments for constipation and fecal incontinence. Method: Sixty-five articles investigating intervention efficacy were identified and reviewed. Twenty-three of the studies were excluded because they were case studies or were less well-controlled single-case designs. The intervention protocol for each study was identified and coded, with studies employing the same interventions matched and evaluated according to the Chambless criteria. Results: From the literature base to date, no well-established interventions have emerged. However, four probably efficacious treatments and three promising interventions were identified. Two different medical interventions plus positive reinforcement fit the criteria for the probably efficacious category (one with fiber recommendation and one without). Three biofeedback plus medical interventions fit efficacy category criteria: one probably efficacious for constipation with abnormal defecation dynamics (full medical intervention plus biofeedback for paradoxical contraction), and two fit the promising intervention criteria for constipation and abnormal defecation dynamics (full medical intervention plus biofeedback for EAS strengthening, correction of paradoxical contraction and home practice; and biofeedback focused on correction of paradoxical contraction, medical intervention without fiber recommendation, and positive reinforcement). Two extensive behavioral interventions plus medical intervention also met efficacy criteria for constipation plus incontinence (medical intervention without laxative maintenance plus positive reinforcement, dietary education, goal setting, and skills building presented in a small-group format fits criteria for a promising intervention; and positive reinforcement and skills building focused on relaxation of the EAS during defecation, but without biofeedback, plus medical intervention meets the probably efficacious criteria). Conclusions: A discussion of the current weaknesses in this research area follows. Specific recommendations for future research are made including greater clarity in treatment protocol and sample descriptions, reporting cure rates rather than success rates, utilization of adherence checks, and investigation of potential differential outcomes for subgroups of children with constipation and incontinence. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|