| Autor: |
Sieck WR; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109, USA. sieck@umich.edu, Quinn CN, Schooler JW |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Memory & cognition [Mem Cognit] 1999 Sep; Vol. 27 (5), pp. 844-55. |
| DOI: |
10.3758/bf03198537 |
| Abstrakt: |
Many of us share a strong intuition that justification forces us to better understand the situations we face. And there is substantial evidence indicating that this is often the case. However, there is a growing body of research showing that, under certain circumstances, explanation and justification can impair performance on a variety of cognitive tasks. In the present research, the effects of justification on judgment of the soundness of analogies were examined. Subjects judged the quality of the match between pairs of stories with varying degrees of superficial and analogical similarity. Experimental subjects either provided reasons for their judgments or wrote recollections of the target stimuli. These subjects rated the match between stimulus pairs as more sound than did control subjects. Also, providing reasons led to poorer discrimination between superficially similar aspects of the stimuli and analogous aspects. Explanations of these findings are proposed, and implications for problem solving and confidence judgment are discussed. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink