| Abstrakt: |
The impact of the mode of detection on outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) was reviewed. Between January 1980 and December 1987, 400 cases of stage I and II breast cancer were treated with BCT. All patients underwent an excisional biopsy, external beam irradiation (RT) to the whole breast (45-50 Gy), and a boost to 60 Gy to the tumor bed. One hundred twenty-four cases (31%) were mammographically detected, whereas 276 (69%) were clinically detected. Median follow-up was 9.2 years. Patients whose cancers were detected by mammography more frequently had smaller tumors (90% T1 vs. 62%, p < 0.0001), lower overall disease stage (78% stage I vs. 47%, p < 0.0001), were older at diagnosis (78% >50 years vs. 54%, p < 0.001), less frequently received chemotherapy (8% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), and had an improved disease-free survival (DFS) (80% vs. 70%, p = 0.014), overall survival (OS) (82% vs. 70%, p = 0.005), and cause-specific survival (CSS) (88% vs. 77%, p = 0.003) at 10 years. However, controlling for tumor size, nodal status, and age, no statistically significant differences in the 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of local recurrence (LR), DFS, CSS, or OS were seen based on the mode of detection. Initial mode of detection was the strongest predictor of outcome after a LR. The 3-year DFS rate after LR was significantly better in initially mammographically detected versus clinically detected cases (100% vs. 61%, p = 0.011). Patients with mammographically detected breast cancer generally have smaller tumors and lower overall disease stage at presentation. However, the mode of detection does not independently appear to affect the success of BCT in these patients. |
